What’s the best eMTB in 2025? We tested 30 e-mountain bikes!

Table of Contents

1. 3 weeks, 30 bikes, zero boredom – our huge 2025 eMTB comparison test
2. From Finale Ligure to Hollywood: the first-ever E-MOUNTAINBIKE Awards
3. Mission impossible? All contenders for the best e-mountain bike of 2025 at a glance
4. What does the best e-MTB of 2025 need to deliver?
5. Pizza, police & Pietra Ligure: our home base for the 2025 e-mountain bike group test
6. E-mountain bike group test: what should you look out for when buying your next eMTB?
7. Out of office but still hard at work – meet our test crew
8. Now it’s time to get nerdy! – Numbers, data and facts from our 2025 e-mountain bike comparison test.
   1. 1. Vertical range test: how far can you really go on your e-mountain bike?
   2. 2. How is fast-charging technology changing eMTB battery design?
   3. 3. Weight analysis from our 2025 e-mountain bike test: clever savings or just clever marketing?
   4. 4. Impossible Climb Challenge – Going up the hard way
   5. 5. The sound of performance? E-bike motor noise under the spotlight
   6. 6. Top-tier vs mid-range in our 2025 e-mountain bike comparison test – does an expensive bike necessarily ride better?
9. The eMTB world in transition – 10 key trends and insights from our mega e-mountain bike group test 2025
10. From the trails to the think tank: our insights and your input are shaping the future of eMTB development
11. Our 7 development and action recommendations for manufacturers
12. Tops & Flops in our 2025 e-mountainbike comparison test
13. What’s the best e-mountainbike of 2025? All eMTBs in this test at a glance
14. Conclusions about our 2025 e-mountainbike comparison test

Seriously… even bigger? You’d have to be mad to pour this much effort into an e-mountain bike comparison test: 3 weeks out of office for testing, 9 weeks back at HQ discussing, analysing, editing and writing it all up. And as if we weren’t busy enough already, we conducted another trend survey on the side, organised our very first E-MOUNTAINBIKE Awards, and also threw a major E-MOUNTAINBIKE Think Tank with a game-changing action plan and shared vision for the future. Add to that a fresh round of recommendations to the industry, based on everything we uncovered in this group test. Even though 2025 hasn’t been the easiest year for the media world – us included – we’re giving it everything we’ve got! Huge thanks to the whole team and everyone who made this possible. High five!

Spoiler alert: we don’t recommend jumping straight into the full video – not if you want to enjoy the full suspense and reading experience of this article!

.

Can you cheat physics? Are bikes with the new DJI motor really setting the ultimate benchmark? Why are batteries getting bigger while range is shrinking? Does a higher price point always translate into better performance? Do those jaw-dropping spec sheets actually hold up on the trail? And are light eMTBs already a thing of the past? In this e-mountain bike group test, we’ve got all the answers – and we’ll show you why more power isn’t necessarily always better. We cut through the spec-sheet jungle, bust marketing myths wide open, and deliver real-world data and analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Plus: we have clear recommendations for the development teams behind the bikes. But first, we’re taking you to Finale Ligure!

3 weeks, 30 bikes, zero boredom – finding the best eMTB for 2025

Ping. Still there? Yep, guilty as charged: back in January, we collectively drove friends, colleagues and industry partners up the wall. 3 weeks away from our desks. 3 weeks in Finale Ligure. 3 weeks of out-of-office replies – all topped off with a healthy serving of trail pics, sunsets, and our very own OUT-OF-OFFICE shirts trending all over social media.

Dolce Vita? Not quite. There was no time for chilling. Instead of desks in front of us, we had dust on our teeth, sunscreen in our eyes, and 30 eMTBs right under our bottoms – six of them so secret you couldn’t even Google them yet, as they hadn’t hit the market at the time of testing. The daily routine? Morning shuttles, lunch-time rock gardens, evening Aperol. In between: pizza, technical climbs, and test protocols – our office was somewhere between a Ligurian dreamscape and the edge of grip.

From Finale Ligure to Hollywood: the first-ever E-MOUNTAINBIKE Awards

Applause – curtains up! Fog drifts through the air. At the legendary STAUD STUDIOS in Leonberg, we brought together the crème de la crème of the industry: 80 CEOs, developers, experts and key decision-makers from the bike world travelled in just for this evening – from the USA, UK, Spain, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, across Germany and beyond.

The murmurs grow louder. Tension builds. Which bikes are hiding beneath those silky covers? Which ones are about to earn the coveted awards and standing ovations for engineering excellence?

Instead of golden statues, there were golden insights. Instead of glamorous gowns, it was all about functional softshells and sneakers. And yet, there was still a touch of Hollywood in the air – as everyone waited eagerly to see who would take the crown for the best eMTB of 2025.

Who snagged the coveted Best in Test and Best Buy awards? And why are there three bikes under those silk covers? Of course, we’re not giving that away just yet! Let the suspense build a little longer.

Mission impossible? All contenders for the best e-MTB of 2025 at a glance

Testing 30 bikes head-to-head to find the best eMTB for 2? Undeniably, that’s a huge undertaking, with a whirlwind of logistics and military-grade planning unfolding backstage.. But that’s just the start – even choosing which bikes make the cut is a big deal: who gets in, and why? At first glance, you might wonder if these bikes can even be compared in the first place. Price points, motor and battery concepts, frame materials – they all vary wildly from model to model. No question: the range in this test field is broader than ever. But that’s exactly what we needed to deliver the best buying advice and a true overview of the market. As the results will show, it’s the only way we could answer exciting questions like:

• Do some bikes even still have a place on the market?
• How much bike do you really get for your money?
• Does a higher price point necessarily mean better performance? And how big is the gap between top-tier and mid-range variants of the same model?
• How much does the motor shape the overall ride experience?
• Do those impressive performance specs actually deliver on the trail – or are they just fancy numbers? To what extent can motor power figures really be compared – and how much of that can you actually feel out on the trail?
• Which bike suits which type of rider?
• How much of a factor is weight on an eMTB – and which components make the biggest difference?
• What are the hottest tech trends shaping the future of e-mountain bike development?

And that’s why some brands are represented by multiple models – or even different variants of the same bike – in this test field. It’s the only way to dig into questions like: how big is the difference between the AMFLOW PL Carbon, which retails at €6,449,and the AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro, which costs over a third more at €9,999? Can you actually feel the difference between the alloy and carbon versions of the Orbea WILD? Which of the Transition Relay models – with Bosch CX or SX motor – makes the most sense for which rider? And does the Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF 8, which costs around a third less than the CF LTD, also deliver a third less fun on the trail?

*There is no separate review for this bike, but you can find our verdict in the summary at the end of this article.

Note:At the time of this test, the free update for the Bosch Performance Line CX Gen5 had not yet been released. All tested Bosch CX motors were therefore running with 85 Nm of torque and 600 watts peak power…

What does the best e-MTB of 2025 need to deliver?

Ever tried driving a Formula 1 car to the supermarket? Probably not – but unlike motorsport, the bike world lets you buy and use the same gear the pros use. Whether it’s a Tour de France racer or a World Cup eMTB, it’s all within reach. Fascinating and desirable, sure – but not exactly what most riders actually need. The same goes for the R&D departments of many bike brands, where designers often build the bikes they personally want to ride, rather than developing bikes and components that truly suit their customers or the broader market. It all starts with suspension and geometry, runs through the choice of component, and ends with motor systems and feature sets.

Since our very first big E-MOUNTAINBIKE group test back in 2014, we’ve designed our testing criteria to reflect one thing above all: the real needs of the market – in other words, your needs. And our annual reader surveys, with input from around 17,000 dedicated riders, play a huge role in shaping that.

And year after year, a clear picture emerges: it’s not about chasing peak numbers and headline specs, but rather about finding the best all-rounder. The bike that can handle a wide range of use cases and deliver consistently, without compromise. The best e-mountain bike of 2025 has to do more than just shine in one area. It needs to bring together seemingly opposing qualities and work just as well for beginners as it does for seasoned riders – no matter the terrain or riding style. It’s the most balanced bike in the entire test field, and as such delivers an unbeatable blend of all-round performance, everyday usability, smart features and total rider confidence. The perfect one-bike solution.

Pizza, police & Pietra Ligure: our home base for the 2025 e-mountain bike group test

Sun, sea, legendary trails and an Aperol on the piazza? Few places are as iconic in the biking world as Finale Ligure on the Mediterranean Riviera. While Finale has become synonymous with endless descents, its neighbouring town, Pietra Ligure – just five kilometres down the road – still flies somewhat under the radar. And yet, this very village has evolved into Europe’s leading uphill trail destination — even hosting the first-ever e-mountain bike race series, including the EDR-E and formerly the EWS-E.

We couldn’t have picked a better location for testing and benchmarking our 30 eMTBs. Between flowing singletracks, rough enduro trails, and the purpose-built tech-climbs of the Finale Outdoor Region, we racked up thousands of trail kilometres. While we were at it, we ran specific vertical range tests to push the bikes – and their batteries – to the limit.

We even had the blessing of Pietra Ligure’s mayor and Italian MTB legend Enrico Guala, who is known worldwide as the godfather of enduro. He supported us throughout this test along with Martino and Nicolò from Agriturismo Rose di Pietra. Nonna’s legendary breakfasts, dreamlike trails right outside the door, and a giant greenhouse turned into a workshop and event space for our 30 eMTBs – it genuinely couldn’t have been better. Oh, and let’s not forget the sea view from our bungalows, the in-house shuttle service from Martino’s “Flow School”riding school, and a kumquat tree for good measure… Like we said before: it really couldn’t have been better.

Work at its finest: once again, we were reminded how much smoother things run when everyone’s inspired and properly fired up – like during our group shot on the piazza in Pietra. Normally, getting a photo like that on the town’s bustling main square would be impossible. Unless, of course, the mayor is on board and sends in the police to cordon it off on a Saturday morning – just so we can roll in with the 30 hottest eMTBs of 2025. Said and done. Grazie mille!

For anyone who loves surfing uphill on their eMTB, the region’s many climbing trails offer a real opportunity to sharpen your riding skills. Because being a kick-ass downhill rider doesn’t automatically make you a good climber. The technique is something you have to learn – timing and skills are totally different when you’re heading uphill. Technical uphill trails like the ones in Finale Ligure are still the exception in most bike regions, but we’re clearly hoping to see more of them in the future. Ideally, with routes for every skill level – from flowing climbs that gently thread their way uphill to brutal straight lines that push you and your bike to the limit. In Finale, you’ll definitely need more of the former, as most of the uphill tracks here are seriously demanding. And while those kinds of climbs are fascinating and desirable, they don’t reflect the kind of terrain most riders actually tackle day to day.

Between downpours and T-shirt sunshine, we experienced the full meteorological spectrum during our January stay in Pietra Ligure. And yes, of course we went for a dip in the sea. To make sure our friends back home didn’t miss out on that little flex, we teamed up with ION to design our very own outfits. The theme? Out of Office. And in proper style, too. Rain or shine, we stayed dry and comfortable on the test track – no matter what the weather threw at us.

Fancy one of these shirts? Then apply here for your chance to win one of three Out of Office shirts!

E-mountain bike group test: what should you look out for when buying your next eMTB?

On paper, plenty of eMTBs seem like a clear-cut choice — at least at first glance.. Most powerful motor, lightest total weight, longest travel – add to cart! But hold on: stop comparing isolated numbers. It’s not about the best spec, it’s about the best overall package. And just because a bike is perfect for one person doesn’t mean that it’s right for you. What really matters are your needs, your riding style, your habits, and your priorities. The decisions you make before buying need to be well thought out. What do I want – and more importantly – what do I actually need? Here’s our checklist with the five key questions you should ask yourself before buying a new eMTB. For those still undecided, there’s good news: where specialist bikes often often demand clear choices from the outset, locking you into a specific use case, the best all-rounders keep your options open – because they’re just that versatile.

1. What do you want to do with your e-mountain bike? Sounds simple, but it’s absolutely crucial. Are you heading out for post-work laps on your local hill, embarking on epic backcountry expeditions, or smashing laps at the bike park every weekend? Long tours, shuttle days or daily commutes – the clearer you are about how you’ll use your new bike, the easier it will be to find the right one. Makes sense, right? Because even the highest-performance eMTB won’t do you much good if you’re riding fire roads 90% of the time.

2. Which e-bike motor concept suits you best? Full-power shuttle feel or a gentle breeze of tailwind? Do you want maximum support for the climbs or something that feels more natural and sporty? Who do you usually ride with – the ECO crew or the TURBO gang? Depending on your group, you’ll need more or less motor power to keep up and stay in the mix. What matters most to you: a natural ride feel, sleek integration, or maximum versatility?

3. How much battery capacity do you really need? Don’t just count watt-hours – focus on how you actually ride: support mode + terrain + rider weight + duration of the ride = your true battery needs. If you’re cruising through the woods in Eco mode, 600 Wh will get you far. But if you’re tackling steep, technical climbs in Turbo, even an 800 Wh battery will drain fast. That doesn’t always mean you need more battery, though. Modular systems like range extenders, spare batteries and the new generation of fast-chargers can be a smarter way to expand your range. Some brands even offer configurators that let you tailor your battery setup to your needs.

4. How important is a removable battery for you? If you always charge the battery directly on the bike – whether at home or on holiday – a permanently-integrated battery is often the more practical option, saving you weight and complexity. But if you live on the third floor in a block of flats without a lift, or rent a holiday home with no charging point near the bike rack, it’s a different story – in that case, a removable battery becomes a real must-have!

5. What kind of ride feel are you looking for? Safety is a big deal – and handling plays a major role in that! Agile or composed? Playful or precise? Some bikes feel intuitive straight away, while others take some getting used to or start to show their limits in certain situations. Knowing how you’d like your bike to ride will help you make the right call – especially if confidence and control matter most to you.

6. Which features do you really need on a bike? Integrated multitool? Storage space for snacks or a mini pump? USB-C port for your smartphone? Integrated lights to get you home after a post-ride beer? Safety features like Bosch’s ABS Pro on the SCOTT Patron can make a real difference – they might even prevent you from crashing or help compensate for riding technique that’s still a work in progress. How smart should your eMTB be? Do you actively use apps, navigation, and connectivity features like Apple FindMy, or are you happier with a more stripped-back setup? Many smart features are nice to have – but only if you actually use them. Think about what really adds value to your trail experience.

Out of office but still hard at work – meet our test crew

If you think that you can find the best eMTB with just one test rider, you probably also believe that it’s fine to order a cappuccino in Italy after midday. To paint a full and detailed picture of each bike, you need more than one riding style in the saddle. That’s why our test crew is as diverse as the trails in Finale Ligure: young and old, light and heavy, rookie and speed junkie, tech nerd and trail wizard. Because it’s only when different perspectives and preferences come together that real discussion happens – and with it, a full picture and proper insight.

Who wants a bike that only shines under lab conditions? Our crew tests hard, gives honest feedback, and debates every detail with real passion. That’s the only way to truly find the best eMTB all-rounder. You’ll see exactly who contributed to this representative result in the next section.

Bene rides fast – but doesn’t chase KOMs. For him, it’s all about having fun, with just enough adrenaline to keep things interesting. And yes, the occasional bold stunt is definitely part of the deal. His bike of choice? The Santa Cruz Vala. Nimble on the descents and seriously punchy uphill thanks to the Bosch CX motor. The smaller, permanently integrated 600 Wh battery? No problem. Bene makes up for it with strong legs and Turbo-level pace in Eco mode – or he just straps on a range extender for those longer missions.

Robin isn’t just the founder of E-MOUNTAINBIKE – he’s also a former downhill pro with race genes still running strong. These days, though, he’s swapped podium chases for fast party laps on his local trails. While his car taste leans toward classic sports cars, he’s an early adopter when it comes to eMTBs. For a quick spin on his home trail loops, he usually grabs the AMFLOW Carbon Pro or the new Specialized Levo 4. For rougher outings, though, it’s the UNNO Mith he reaches for – few bikes combine sex appeal and performance quite like it.

Lars likes his bikes sporty and lean – even with a motor onboard. He’s happy to trade a bit of power for a more physical ride, especially since this former gym rat still enjoys a bit of leg day. The Specialized Levo SL, the lightest bike in the test field, is right up his alley: natural handling, fun on the descents, and properly challenging on the climbs – especially if you’re trying to keep up with the full-power crew.

Rob basically learned to ride on an eMTB – well, mountain biking, at least. That’s why confidence and easy handling are top priorities for him. And it’s exactly what made the FOCUS JAM² 6.0 his top pick. The beginner-friendly ride feel makes it instantly accessible, and the forgiving suspension combined with the high front end gives Rob the confidence to ride without worrying about an unplanned front flip. And if things do go sideways, the robust aluminium frame of the JAM² 6.0 is a bit more forgiving than carbon – while still looking just as slick.

Martin has a thing for loud trousers – and he rides just as boldly, at least when he knows the trail. As a development engineer, he’s also drawn to anything that feels like a glimpse into the future. That’s why the UNNO Mith Race with the DJI Avinox M1 motor really speaks to him – especially when it comes to integration and finely tuned power delivery. This progressive bike redefines the benchmark for design and flair – which makes it a perfect match for Martin’s unconventional streak.

Peter wants it all – and then some – from his bike. So it’s no surprise that the editor-in-chief of sister magazine ENDURO opted for the most expensive ride in this test: the Specialized Levo 4. He was one of the first in the world to test it back in autumn 2024 in Switzerland, and the positive impression he got then was confirmed again in Finale Ligure. What Peter values most about this bike is how it handles everything without ever becoming demanding – all while offering clever features like the SWAT storage in the frame, fast charging option, and the removable battery.

For Simon, it’s all about balanced nutrition, harmony between body and mind – and the perfect weight distribution between front and rear wheel. A healthy lifestyle and e-mountain biking go hand in hand for him, fuelling the motivation to rack up even more vertical metres downhill. His favourite ride? The Orbea Rise, thanks to its super natural handling and spot-on balance. And that slight rattle from the Shimano motor? Easy to ignore when you’re centred, in the zone, and tuned in only to the sounds of the forest.

Juli’s all about sleek looks, chilled climbs and a low system weight. He lovingly refers to his YT DECOY SN with FAZUA motor as Muad’Dib – which means “desert mouse.” And fittingly, the DECOY is just as nimble and agile as Juli is at the climbing gym. The slightly clunky motor remote? Doesn’t bother him one bit – because for Juli, the ride is mostly about the descents. And as for climbing? Just a means to an end. With its 60 Nm of torque, the lightweight FAZUA motor is more than enough to bulk up those calves. On the flats, he’s often pushing well past the 25 km/h limit – and by the end of the day, Juli’s usually rolling home with a solid 32 km/h average.

Eric wasn’t just a test rider in Finale Ligure – he was also our head mechanic. He prefers bikes with intuitive handling and, needless to say, ones that require minimal maintenance. And when something does need fixing, it should be quick and straightforward. The GHOST E-RIOT won him over completely. Tons of travel and traction on the trail, and in the workshop, a fully familiar and proven Bosch system with slick integration. Display in the top tube, system controller under the top tube, and a Mini Remote on the bars – nothing’s missing, and no electronic components are left exposed in a crash. Just how Eric likes it.

Lea is a bit of an eMTB skeptic. She only got into mountain biking two years ago, but with regular training, bike park trips and the perfect location in the heart of Innsbruck, her skills have skyrocketed. Even so, she prefers to ease into things – and has found her match in the Canyon Spectral:ONfly. The TQ motor delivers gentle, natural support without kicking in abruptly when it’s least welcome. The rest of the power? That comes from Lea’s well-trained legs, which is why she’s not shy about tackling even the trickiest climbs – despite the lower torque.

At 50+, Erik isn’t looking to take unnecessary risks – which is why he values a high front end for extra confidence and a suspension setup that forgives riding mistakes while still keeping the bike on track. The SCOTT Patron gives him exactly that reassuring ride feel. And when things get a bit too fast or slippery, the Bosch eBike ABS Pro lets him slow things down safely and smoothly. No unexpected front wheel lockups, no wild rear wheel lift. As someone who works in the sports car industry, Erik knows one thing for sure: traction is everything.

Manne enjoys a relaxed pace when riding. Everyday practicality, a big battery and plenty of motor power are all at the top of his priority list. Add in a comfortable, upright riding position – like the one of the AMFLOW Carbon Pro – and most of the boxes on Manne’s wishlist are already ticked. The power delivery of the DJI motor is impressively smooth and easy to control, despite its high output. And if the bike also happens to be cleared for use with a dog trailer, then it’s truly perfect – because it means that his dog Henry can come along for the ride!

Now it’s time to get nerdy! – Numbers, data and facts from our 2025 e-mountain bike comparison test.

How do you define and measure the best e-mountain bike in the world? With a test rig? A ruler? A stopwatch? A power meter? A stroke-o-meter? A great bike is more than just its specs – it’s more than the sum of its parts. What really matters isn’t just the data, but what you actually feel and experience on the trail. Sure, analysis and controlled test rides can help put things into perspective – but the real magic lies in how it all comes together out there in the real world. And this year, we went ALL IN to capture exactly that! Bigger, more detailed, and more in-depth than ever before – we pulled out all the stops to bring you the most comprehensive group test in E-MOUNTAINBIKE’s history.

More than just the full programme –These five additional test formats added depth and context to our classic back-to-back comparisons, offering new perspectives on real-world performance, versatility, and rider experience.

1. Vertical range test: We fully drained the batteries of the most exciting bikes under identical conditions – and gathered a wealth of insights. Important to note: vertical range ≠ efficiency.
2. Charging tests: From 0 to 100? Fast charging is one of the hottest new trends. We measured exactly how quickly the batteries recharge – and what you need to know before you plug in.
3. Weight analysis: What factors contribute to the significant weight differences among eMTBs? Where does the additional weight actually come from – the frame, the wheels, or the motor system? We completely stripped down several bikes, weighed every single component, and can now tell you exactly where manufacturers are saving weight in smart ways – and where they aren’t.
4. Impossible Climb Challenge: Do high power and torque really make a decisive difference to the riding experience? How well do the top bikes in this test actually climb in extreme conditions? And what other factors come into play when the going gets steep? We put the bikes to the test to find out.
5. Noise levels: Armed with a microphone, we hit the trails to find out – just how loud are the different motor systems really?
6. High-end vs mid-range: How big are the differences between flagship and more affordable models? We took three bikes and tested them in both their top-tier and mid-range spec variants – head-to-head, same trails, same conditions.

Over 17,000 of you took part in our reader and trend survey. Your responses gave us valuable extra context to interpret the test data and better understand what riders like you really need.

As you can see, we’ve gone all-in – collecting a mountain of data, numbers and real-world riding impressions for this group test.

Happy nerding – but fair warning: stats and superlatives aren’t everything. What really matters is what works for you when you hit the trail. After all, what good is a motor with 120 Nm of torque if your front wheel lifts off the ground on every climb, or if the rear tire spins out of control at the worst possible moment?

Yeah, exactly – absolutely nothing!

That’s why we don’t just test with callipers and spreadsheets, but with muddy trousers and glowing brake rotors. We combine analysis with on-trail experience. Data with dirt. Theory with tire wear…

1. Vertical range test: how far can you really go on your e-mountain bike?

An 840 Wh battery might sound like your golden ticket to eMTB heaven. But more capacity doesn’t necessarily mean more range. Sounds paradoxical? Not if you understand the full picture. That’s exactly why we carried out detailed vertical range tests – right down to the bitter end, when the motor shut off and the battery was fully drained. And of course, we didn’t do it in some air-conditioned lab, but out on the roads above Pietra Ligure – where real-world conditions don’t care about bold marketing claims.

If you’re wondering why we talk about vertical range rather than range, here’s why: manufacturer specs that promise “up to 85 km” – or even 157 km in DJI’s case – might sound impressive on a brochure, but they say very little about how far you’ll actually get in real off-road riding. Above the 25 km/h threshold, you could theoretically clock 1,000 km – with extra emphasis on theoretically 😉 eMTBs rarely cruise along on flat roads – they’re built to climb, to get you to the trailhead, and those climbs can be seriously steep. If you paid attention in physics class, you’ll know: altitude costs energy. It takes far more effort to move a body uphill than on level ground. That’s why the real question isn’t how far you can cruise on tarmac, but how many vertical metres you can pile up with motor support.

Why vertical range alone doesn’t tell the whole story

Sure – a number is a number. But no matter how we’d set up the test, we’d never have come away with a value that’s 100% universally applicable. Why? Because vertical range isn’t a fixed figure – it’s an equation with a whole load of variables!

One crucial factor we can’t ignore is riding speed – or more precisely, the time it takes to complete the climb. That’s what puts consumption and vertical range into proper context. After all, the formula is simple: power = work / time. On top of that, there are plenty of real-world variables that can significantly affect vertical range – and before you dive into our tables, we want to give you an idea of what they are!

• System weight – The heavier the rider, bike and gear, the more energy is needed to get everything moving – especially when climbing or accelerating.
• Ride mode & motor settings – Turbo might be fun, but it munches through your battery fast. The support mode, assistance level, and available peak power all have a massive impact on energy consumption.
• Rolling resistance – MaxxGrip or SuperSoft? EXO+ or Super Gravity? Schwalbe Magic Mary or MAXXIS Dissector? Tires can vary massively in rolling resistance depending on compound, casing and tread pattern. But that’s not all – tire pressure, tread wear, and even the surface you’re riding on all play a role in how much energy your tires soak up.
• Gradient – The steeper the climb and the more powerful the motor, the more energy gets drawn. In other words: on gentle gradients, both strong and less powerful motors tend to consume similar amounts of energy – but on steeper climbs, powerful motors use noticeably more, although they’ll often get you to the top faster. Even on relatively mild inclines, gradient resistance quickly becomes the dominant force working against you.
• Efficiency of the motor system – How efficiently does your drive unit convert electrical energy into propulsion?
• Pedalling cadence & riding style – Motors from TQ and ZF require a certain cadence by design to run efficiently. Then there’s your individual riding style: a smooth, consistent pedal stroke helps reduce energy consumption. Another factor is how evenly you pedal – and how sensitively the motor responds to that input.
• Other road load forces – In addition to rolling resistance and gradient resistance, acceleration and air resistance also play a role – with air resistance increasing rapidly as speed goes up.
• Suspension components – Especially when riding off-road, suspension setup plays a key role – not just in how well the bike handles obstacles, but also in how much drive energy is effectively converted into forward motion.
• Ambient temperature – Every battery system has its own ideal operating range, usually around 20 °C – and for DJI, even a bit higher. Cold batteries perform less efficiently – just like our muscles!

How did we determine vertical range in our huge 2025 eMTB comparison test?

There are several ways to measure vertical range in real-world conditions. Creating a completely standardised and universally valid comparison – whether between full bikes or individual motor systems – is extremely difficult, if not impossible, given the wide range of influencing factors.. That’s why we focused on a clearly defined testing procedure and did everything we could to generate data that offers meaningful insights for you. The basic principle? Keep as many variables consistent as possible to get reliable, real-world results. But of course, it’s still a practical test – and some factors can never be fully eliminated.
Our goal when designing the vertical range test was to assess each bike as a complete system – just like you’d ride it straight out of the shop. Sure, differences in tire rolling resistance can significantly affect results, sometimes by several dozen watts – and that naturally impacts consumption and vertical range. That’s why, alongside those key figures, we also calculated an additional value: overall system efficiency. This took into account total system weight, elevation gain and time – giving us a more holistic assessment of each bike’s real-world energy use.

How did we run the test? To determine vertical range, we rode each eMTB up a defined climb multiple times and then rolled back down with the motor switched off. This setup enabled a realistic simulation of motor cooling via airflow, replicating conditions typically found in hilly terrain. During the climbs, we used pedals with integrated power meters to ensure consistency across all bikes, maintaining a steady cadence of 75 rpm and a rider power output of exactly 150 watts.

Our test conditions in detail:

• route length: 2.55 km
• average gradient: 6.47%
• elevation gain: 165 m
• rider power output: 150 watts
• cadence: 75 rpm
• Ambient temperature: 14–19 °C
• Consistent tire pressure (f/r): 1.5/1.8 bar

All vertical range tests were carried out in Turbo mode, as this is the only setting that allows for a fair comparison. The support levels below Turbo vary greatly – both in terms of peak torque and power delivery – and each manufacturer defines their modes differently, making direct comparisons difficult — and in some cases, even meaningless.. On top of that, running full vertical range tests in every ride mode simply wasn’t feasible from a logistical point of view. Sure, we could have done it – but we’d probably still be out there in the hills of Finale, legs burning, watching the battery crawl towards 0% in Eco mode. And let’s be honest: there’s not enough espresso in Italy to boost our legs through that. Of course, we would’ve loved to test the vertical range of every single bike – but even that would’ve pushed the limits of what was possible. So instead, we focused on key models with varying motor systems and battery sizes.

To track the vertical range, average speed and elapsed time during our vertical range tests, we used a Garmin Edge Explore 2 with GPS tracking. Using the nominal battery capacity and the vertical range achieved, we then calculated each bike’s energy consumption – based on the unit Wh per 100 vertical metres. However, this consumption figure alone doesn’t tell us much about the overall efficiency of the bike – let alone the motor system – because the differences in climbing speed between bikes were simply too big. Needless to say, reaching the summit faster requires more power and results in higher energy use. To allow for a proper efficiency comparison, it’s essential to factor in not only the vertical range achieved but also the time it took to get there. But first, a quick physics refresher: all motor systems had to perform the same task – lifting a mass consisting of rider and bike against gravity to a higher elevation.

Want an example? The Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF LTD achieved a vertical range of 932 metres – nearly identical to the MERIDA eONE-SIXTY SL, which reached 919 metres. This means that both bikes, with roughly similar system weights, covered almost the same vertical gain.. But here’s the catch: the Canyon took over an hour to do it, while the MERIDA nailed its 919 metres in just under 47 minutes! If you factor in time, that elevation gain becomes elevation power – and in this case, the MERIDA delivered significantly more power than the Canyon. And that is the key difference!
With the calculated elevation power, the only question left is how much energy was needed to make that climb. The maths is simple:

elevation energy used / potential energy [Wh] = average elevation power [W] (minus rider input) × time taken [h]

In a nutshell: by dividing the elevation gain (work done) by the time taken, we get the average elevation power – with the measured rider input subtracted. Multiply that by the time, and you get the theoretical elevation energy required for the climb. Rolling and air resistance aren’t factored in here, but on climbs, they play a much smaller role than overcoming gravity.

In the final step, we compare the elevation energy used with the energy drawn from the battery. In other words, we calculate an efficiency value by dividing the output energy (elevation energy) by the input energy (from the battery).

And there it is: an efficiency ranking. The higher the percentage, the better. In our testing procedure, the Haibike HYBE CF 11 with the Bosch Performance Line CX motor achieved the highest calculated efficiency. What does this mean? Based on the amount of energy drawn from the battery, the Haibike delivered the highest physical elevation output – in other words, it converted more of each watt-hour into actual climbing performance, rather than losing it to inefficiencies. This result also points toward the Bosch CX motor being particularly efficient. Points toward because not all road load forces were included in this calculation – for that, we’d need precise rolling and air resistance data from the lab or a wind tunnel… maybe in the next big test? 😉

Important note: if we tweak just one variable – like the average gradient – the energy consumption of each bike could change in relation to the others, which would also affect the efficiency rankings. It’s a bit like judging all 11 players on a football team based only on how they play in midfield, overlooking that some are strikers while others excel in defence.

*Our data refers to the Bosch Turbo mode MY25 of the Performance Line CX Gen5 with 600 W peak power
**minus rider input

Notable: UNNO and AMFLOW both rely on the same motor system, yet show clear differences in vertical range and average speed. The UNNO achieved a higher efficiency in our test scenario – which is likely due primarily to different software settings. AMFLOW riders will know first-hand how a software update in 2024 significantly affected vertical range.

Software tweaks for more range? How motor tuning can impact your eMTB’s vertical range

Vertical range doesn’t just depend on the usual suspects – like rider weight, gradient or rolling resistance – but also on one key factor that’s often overlooked: the software. It controls how much power your motor delivers, when it ramps up, and crucially, when it starts to hold back. Our test made it clear: not all eMTBs treat their final few battery percent the same way. Take the AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro and the UNNO Mith Pro, for example – they run the same hardware but use completely different software setups, which regulate motor power at different battery levels. Then there’s the Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo 4 (840 Wh), which keeps pushing at full pelt right to the very end – and maintains an impressive average speed of 24.2 km/h while doing so. Despite delivering high output until the last drop, it still manages a solid vertical range of 1,421 metres.

That’s great if you’re smashing out fast-paced post-work laps and want to blast all the way to the last percent – without your system cutting back just because you dropped below 15% battery charge. It’s a different story with systems like Dyname, FAZUA or TQ. These motors start limiting output early in the state of charge (SOC) curve – and you can’t switch that off. On long rides, this makes sense. But for short, punchy sessions, it can feel like an unwanted energy-saving mode. Let’s be honest: if I’ve still got 15% battery left, I want to decide for myself whether to burn it or not. And you can – just by dropping into a lower support mode.

With its modest 480 Wh battery, the Rocky Mountain Instinct Powerplay SL cruises at an average speed of just 15.4 km/h – and yet still manages a surprising vertical range of 1,411 metres! That’s one of the highest results in the entire test field, nearly matching the Specialized Levo, despite the Levo running at almost 9 km/h faster and packing nearly double the battery capacity. That said, the final 321 metres of climbing on the Instinct Powerplay SL felt like extra time in a football match – painfully slow and exhausting. Still, it shows how clever software management and an efficient drive unit can squeeze impressive performance out of smaller batteries, provided you’re willing to accept a lower average speed. It’s a matter of taste – but what really counts is giving the rider a choice, rather than forcing power reduction when there’s still plenty of battery left.

More battery capacity but still less range on your eMTB? That’s exactly what’s coming our way in 2025!

In the current arms race for maximum wattage, there’s one thing that’s easy to forget: range. Batteries are getting bigger – but this doesn’t necessarily mean that you’ll go further. In fact, in many cases, you’ll ride less. Why? Because energy consumption rises sharply when riding in Turbo mode with full support. Sure, most riders don’t spend much time in Turbo in everyday-riding scenarios. Stick to moderate support modes and you’ll get much more out of your battery in real-world conditions. And this is where it gets interesting: the biggest differences between bikes don’t show up at full throttle, but in how efficiently the systems manage energy under normal riding behaviour.

The Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo boasts the biggest battery in the entire test field at a hefty 840 Wh – delivering a vertical range of 1,421 metres.
For comparison’s sake: the Haibike HYBE CF 11 reached 1,816 metres – nearly 400 metres more – with a slightly smaller 800 Wh battery. How’s that possible? Simple: the Levo is an absolute powerhouse , pushing up to 720 watts of continuous output. Ride it in Turbo mode and you’ll gain plenty of vertical metres – but you’ll drain the battery just as fast. This explains the average ride time of just under 54 minutes, a consumption rate of 57.35 Wh per 100 vertical metres, and an impressive average speed of 24.2 km/h. The same goes for bikes that come equipped with the DJI Avinox M1 motor: with a max output of 850 watts (excluding the 30-second boost mode), an 800 Wh battery would be fully drained in just about 56 minutes – assuming the motor could sustain peak power the entire time.

2. How is fast-charging technology changing eMTB battery design?

You want to head out but forgot to charge your bike? You’re stopping for lunch at a trail centre and want to throw in a few more laps with a full battery after dessert? Or you prefer a smaller main battery in the frame and no range extender? If you need power fast, you’re going to love fast charging.

What’s long been standard for smartphones and electric cars is now making its way into the eMTB world: in 2025, fast charging is becoming one of the hottest features. Three bikes in our group test – the Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo, the AMFLOW PL, and the UNNO Mith with DJI motor – already come with fast chargers that open up new possibilities (some more than others) and are shifting the conversation around battery concepts!

A 30-minute charge with the DJI fast charger already delivers more energy than a Bosch PowerMore 250 range extender – and weighs 300 grams less to boot. A clear win for anyone who can rely on a charging stop along their route and would rather carry a charger in their pack than an additional battery.

Already possible today: from 5 to 80% in under an hour – that’s not just awesome, but actually a real ride-saver! For anyone who’s ever forgotten to charge – or just wants to keep going.

And the dream scenario? Public fast-charging stations with a universal, cross-brand system – no need for range extenders or special chargers. What’s still missing? A standardised charging interface for bikes and stations. But there’s good news: that’s exactly what the Charge2Bike consortium is working on – fingers crossed!

The first market data – how would e-mountain bikers use fast charging?

Fast charging? Absolutely – as long as it’s free! According to our trend survey from March 2025, 65% of you have a positive view of fast charging. But when it comes to paying extra for it, the enthusiasm drops: over half of respondents would pass if it meant additional costs. That said, this might simply reflect the fact that the real-world benefits of fast charging haven’t fully sunk in yet.

As it stands, only 0.5% of you are willing to pay more than €300 for a fast charger. In other words: if fast charging is going to break through in a big way, manufacturers not only need to develop and release fast chargers – they’ll also have to include them as standard. AMFLOW set the benchmark in this regard: from entry-level to flagship, every AMFLOW PL model comes with a fast charger as standard. UNNO follows the same approach. However, the latest e-mountain bikes featuring the DJI Avinox motor also show that not every brand is quite as generous. The Forbidden Druid, for example, comes with a 168 W charger. In practice, this means that charging from 0 to 100% takes nearly twice as long compared to the fast charger – 4 hours 45 minutes versus 2 hours 25 minutes – even on the €11,899 top-end Druid CorE 1. Specialized only include the fast charger with their S-Works flagship model. For all other versions, you’ll have to pay a hefty €500 extra!

The differences in our e-mountain bike test are striking: while bikes with Bosch, Shimano or FAZUA motor systems can take over four hours to fully charge, Specialized and DJI are clearly two steps ahead with their charging solutions. In our tests, the 840 Wh battery of the Specialized Turbo Levo charged in just 120 minutes, which translates into an impressive average charging speed of 7.3 Wh/min. Close behind: the 800 Wh battery of the DJI system, which can be found on the UNNO Mith and AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro, charged in 145 minutes as specified by the manufacturer – which is 5.8 Wh/min. In direct comparison, Bosch systems like the one of the Focus JAM² (2.4 Wh/min) or the Shimano drive of the Cannondale Moterra SL (2.9 Wh/min) feel sluggish.

But there’s another important factor that manufacturers need to consider when it comes to fast charging: in our survey, we asked you which aspects matter most to you in a fast charger. Besides price, two other key factors stood out: weight and size. Both are totally relevant – especially if the charger is meant to replace a range extender on tour.
A huge, heavy 2,674 g fast charger with a fan – like the one used for the fourth-generation Turbo Levo – is certainly high-quality and powerful, but at the same time misses the mark for much of the market. We prefer DJI’s approach here: while their fast charger doesn’t quite match Specialized’s in terms of output, it weighs just 1,115 g and measures a compact 185 x 75 x 40 mm. These factors make the DJI fast charger backpack-friendly – and a genuine bonus on longer rides.

What’s the benefit? The latest generation of fast-charging technology enables new usage scenarios, and, as a result, modular battery concepts are getting a serious rethink. If you can charge quickly, you rarely need a range extender or a spare battery. And if you need less capacity, you can ride a lighter bike – which brings clear advantages in terms of handling. As you can see: the potential is definitely there!

But isn’t fast charging meant to damage the battery? We don’t yet have solid long-term data on that, but what really matters is how the charging is done. Just like with electric cars, the charging curve ramps up quickly at the beginning and slows down as the state of charge (SOC) increases – to protect the battery. The final 20% takes significantly longer for that reason. It works a bit like filling a glass with water: at first, you can turn the tap on full blast, but the fuller the glass gets, the more carefully you need to top it up to avoid spilling. Smart move: Specialized offer four selectable charging modes on their fast charger (ECO, Standard, Fast, 80%), so you only use the fast-charge function when you really need it. And if you activate the 80% charge limit – like on the Specialized Levo – you can extend the battery’s lifespan even further.

The battery concepts of all e-mountain bikes in the test

Below, you’ll find an overview of the battery concepts and options for all bikes in the test field. Wondering what the “nominal battery capacity” in the table actually means? If you’re looking at the battery specs in an eMTB data sheet, it’s important to know: marketing figures and nominal capacities are often two very different things. So, what is nominal battery capacity? It’s based on standardised measurements that every manufacturer is required to disclose. This doesn’t just allow us as users to compare fairly – it also provides a level playing field for the manufacturers themselves. Which is why more and more bike brands are calling for nominal capacity to become the new standard for how battery capacity is reported. The fact is, many brands are already sticking to the nominal value, while others continue to exploit the gap in customer knowledge – adding a little marketing magic to inflate their battery figures. You’ll find our full article on battery capacities here.

3. Weight analysis from our 2025 e-mountain bike test: clever savings or just clever marketing?

Where does all the bulk come from? and where does it make sense to shed grams? Weight is a big topic for many of us – not just on our bathroom scale, but also when it comes to eMTBs. But how much difference does a lighter bike actually make? Do you have to sacrifice battery capacity, motor power, puncture protection or traction to get there? Is there such a thing as the mythical magic pill for trail weight – or is it all just smoke and mirrors?

Light = better? Not necessarily. Some manufacturers are still cutting weight in all the wrong places. Thin tire casings, undersized brake rotors and fragile components might look great on paper – but often fall short out on the trail. What really matters isn’t the raw weight, but how that weight is distributed and whether the build suits your riding style. Our group test in Finale Ligure proved it clearly: heavier bikes can ride significantly better than lighter ones – if the balance, spec and overall concept are spot on.

The biggest misconception? Focusing solely on weight overlooks two key things: first, where the weight was saved. And second, whether that saving actually makes sense. A light eMTB isn’t 4 kg lighter just because it has less battery capacity and a smaller motor. In reality, the real differences often lie in completely different areas – like the frame, wheels, or cockpit – and together, these can easily add up to several kilograms.

Some manufacturers still cut back on performance in the name of weight savings. A bike with a thin, lightweight tire casing and small brake rotors might look great on the scales – but out on the trail, it often lacks control and grip. Unfortunately, the weight spec alone won’t tell you whether the bike is properly equipped for your riding style and body weight. Our group test in Finale Ligure made that clear: some heavier bikes actually ride noticeably better than lighter ones – and the reason is simple. Weight distribution matters more than weight alone!

Our approach: strip it down, weigh it, understand it. That’s why in this test, we didn’t just weigh the complete bikes – we spent hours disassembling them into individual parts. Every single component went on the scale. This allowed us to analyse precisely: who’s saving weight where? And who’s deliberately adding it – for better performance, safety or durability?

The result: we compared six eMTBs that couldn’t be more different – from the ultra-light Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF LTD to the GHOST E-RIOT LTD, which weighs nearly six kilos more. To make things clear, we grouped the individual components into logical categories like suspension, wheels, cockpit, and drivetrain.

The best e-mountain bike of 2025: how is the weight distributed?

Looking at the absolute figures, a few things stand out right away:

• There are already significant differences at the heart of the bike – the frame – with over half a kilo separating the six models.
• Beyond the battery and motor, the biggest weight-saving potential lies in the wheels, suspension, and brakes.
• Specialized run a relatively heavy motor system.
• The DJI battery is noticeably lighter than Bosch’s – despite having the same capacity.
• By contrast, there’s hardly any variation in the drivetrains across the bikes.

What actually has the biggest weight impact on an e-mountain bike, relatively speaking? The battery? The motor? Wrong! Even on a full-power eMTB, it’s the wheels – meaning wheelset and tires – that tip the scales the most. A closer look at the numbers reveals that some manufacturers throw away unnecessary grams, while others make smart spec choices. UNNO’s Mith sets the benchmark here: a lightweight motor system paired with a very light, fully integrated 800 Wh battery, lightweight but powerful brakes, solid wheels with grippy tires, and a noticeably lighter dropper post. The result? A final weight of just 21.4 kg – without compromise. Instead of trying to cut major weight in one area, the Catalan brand trims a little everywhere.

Percentage share of total weight

Have they lost a wheel?

1.4 kg! That’s the difference in weight between the wheels of the Orbea WILD and the Canyon Spectral. While this might sound wild, it’s true. How’s that possible? To be fair, the Canyon entered the race with a small advantage thanks to the smaller 27.5” rear wheel. But even the Canyon’s front wheel alone is 752 grams lighter than Orbea’s. Both bikes run well-treaded tires from MAXXIS. The real difference, though, isn’t obvious at first glance: the Canyon roll out with an EXO casing up front and EXO+ at the rear. The Orbea WILD, on the other hand, was “armed” via the MyO configurator with DH casings front and rear – a choice that accounts for more than half of the extra weight. A sensible move if you’re spending a lot of time on rough, technical terrain. Then there’s the wheels themselves: the Reynolds wheelset of the Canyon is exactly 700 grams lighter than Orbea’s in-house OQUO wheelset. Unlike Canyon, who used carbon rims, Orbea rely on alloy. Bottom line: know your needs. 1.4 kg is a serious chunk of weight – and for lighter riders who mostly stick to flow trails, it’s weight worth saving. But if you want peace of mind on burly terrain, going the other way is probably the smarter call – and you’ll worry far less about flats.

How much weight difference is there in the suspension?

Another key point: the suspension. Is it worth saving 500 grams here? Our answer: in most cases, no! A lightweight eMTB with underwhelming suspension tends to feel light on the trail too – and not just in a good way. The Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF LTD and the AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro both come equipped with a FOX 36 fork and a FLOAT X shock, while the Orbea WILD M-LTD comes with a noticeably more capable setup with a a FOX 38 and FLOAT X2. But it’s not just about the numbers on the lowers – what really counts is the damper cartridge inside. A FOX 36 with a FIT4 cartridge performs in a completely different league compared to the same fork with a GRIP X or GRIP X2 damper, especially when it comes to adjustability and trail performance. For the shock, it’s the model itself – X2 or FLOAT X – that makes the difference in performance and tuning flexibility. That said, with its greater oil volume and wider range of adjustments, a FLOAT X2 shock is only better if it suits the bike’s rear suspension and is properly tuned to harmonise with it. When it does, the extra weight can actually be beneficial: more oil = more consistent damping = more control on long, demanding descents.

The same goes for the forks: the FOX 38 isn’t necessarily the better fork just because it’s stiffer. For lighter riders, a well-tuned FOX 36 with a top-tier damper can be every bit as capable – and even easier to handle on the trail.

Our take: trail performance trumps weight. Always. High-quality suspension makes up for the extra weight with consistently better performance, more sensitive response – and ultimately, way more fun on the trail.

The best e-mountain bike of 2025: how big are the weight differences in battery and motor systems?

Conclusions on the topic of weight

Our extensive real-world testing made one thing clear: weight balance and centre of gravity are far more important than raw weight figures taken in isolation! Sure, there are places where saving weight makes sense – but it always needs to match your riding style and demands – otherwise it could quickly backfire. Manufacturers can’t really predict how you’ll actually ride your bike. All the better if you can take matters into your own hands.That’s why we’d love to see more brands following the same approach as Orbea, Propain and Thömus – which all have extensive configurators that let you customise your bike down to the smallest detail . This way, weight weenies, hassle-free riders and hardcore downhill bashers all get exactly what they need.

Impossible Climb Challenge – Going up the hard way

Do those impressive figures actually translate into impressive trail performance? Or are today’s spec sheets just smoke and mirrors? How comparable are motor performance stats really – and what can you actually feel when you’re riding? How steep is too steep? And how much power do you really need to keep climbing? That’s exactly what we wanted to find out – so we pushed a number of selected bikes to their limits in our Impossible Climb Challenge. The goal: push the boundaries to explore the extremes, which is the only way to really highlight the differences. Not for the final rating of the bikes, but to gain real insights. Because let’s be honest: hardly any normal eMTBer would voluntarily tackle a climb as brutal as the one in our Impossible Climb Challenge. Which is exactly what made it so fascinating.

To analyse the bikes’ extreme uphill performance fairly and ensure better comparability, we got two experienced testers to ride the same technical, super-rocky ridge in Finale Ligure – a trail so brutal it’s not even officially marked as a bike route. After two to three warm-up runs to get a feel for the terrain, each tester completed one scored run per bike. Only in cases of evident riding or handling error was a rerun allowed. The evaluation was based not just on the time, but also factored in technical mistakes and physical effort. From this, we calculated an adjusted completion time.

• Completion time(seconds) the time it took to complete the climb
• Effort:subjective rating on a scale from 1 to 10 – based not only on heart rate but also on how hard our test riders had to work to keep the bike on the ideal uphill line
• Foot downs: average number of times the rider had to put a foot down per run
• Pushing/dismounts: average number of times the rider had to push or walk because riding was no longer an option
• Adjusted completion time (seconds): combines recorded time, riding mistakes and effort into a single, objectively comparable value

The fair success rate indicates how likely it is to complete our test course with the respective bike.

Same motor, completely different climbing performance

The AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro with the DJI Avinox M1 motor was by far the best climber in the entire test field – even though it came equipped with a relatively shallow-profiled MAXXIS Dissector MaxxTerra rear tire. And what about the UNNO Mith Pro, which relies on the exact same DJI Avinox M1 motor? It dropped to fifth place, despite identical motor output. This shows clearly: suspension, pedalling position and geometry – or rather the bike as a whole – have a massive impact on performance.

More watts ≠ more success

With “only” 600 watts of peak output, the Orbea WILD with a Bosch CX Gen5 motor climbed better than the Specialized Turbo Levo (720 W) and the UNNO Mith (over 1,000 W). The same trend shows up in the midfield: the Rocky Mountain, with 550 W peak power, and the Orbea Rise (400 W) outperform the R RAYMON Tarok (600 W) and the MERIDA eONE-SIXTY SL (600 W) – despite the latter having higher peak output and, in some cases, more torque. Strong balance, smooth power delivery and capable components make all the difference.

Uphill light?

If you want to tackle technical climbs, you need a certain level of support. Light eMTBs like the YT DECOY SN with the FAZUA Ride 60 motor, the Specialized Levo SL with the Specialized 1.2 SL, and the Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF LTD with the TQ-HPR50 naturally hit their limits on really technical uphills – and get left behind.

What really matters

At the same time, power only matters if it actually makes it to the ground — and can be applied in a controlled, usable way. Our challenge showed clearly: just as important as peak figures are traction control, modulation, and the interplay between geometry, suspension, tires and the bike’s basic setup.

The most powerful motor is useless if the bike doesn’t work with it.

Raw watt and torque figures aren’t just for show – but they’re still only an indicator of climbing ability on technical terrain. Our Impossible Climb Challenge showed that motor performance data isn’t all that easy to compare, because there are several other factors that have a huge impact – like the motor’s overrun behaviour and pedalling style, both of which can massively boost uphill performance in tough conditions. For example, Bosch use Extended Boost to allow riders to give a short pedal kick and activate overrun, helping the rear wheel clear a step where traditional pedalling wouldn’t be possible – a clear advantage. By contrast, the ZF motor, for instance, only starts supporting once it detects a certain cadence, which makes it almost impossible to get moving again in extremely steep climbing sections.

5.The sound of performance? E-bike motor noise under the spotlight

We deliberately chose not to measure decibel levels – because noise is subjective. What hums along pleasantly for one rider might already be irritating for another. That’s why, on this point, we’re leaving the judgement up to you.

Clear enough: the ZF CentriX is by far the loudest motor in the entire test field. The Dyname S4 Lite delivers surprisingly solid support but feels mechanical and slightly rough when pedalling – almost as if fine sand were moving inside. But have a listen for yourself:

6. Top-tier vs mid-range in our 2025 e-mountain bike comparison test – does an expensive bike necessarily ride better?

Bling-bling or bam-bam? On the trail, it’s performance that counts – not prestige. At least for most riders. Do you really need the top-of-the-range model? Sure, the fancy Kashima coating on FOX’s Factory fork looks lush, but in practice, it doesn’t offer any noticeable advantages over the more affordable Performance model. But what about other components? Where does it make sense to save money – and where does it not?

When it comes to finding the best eMTB of 2025, price usually plays a secondary role – after all, our main focus is on comparing flagship models and innovation leaders. But this year it’s a different story. We also included more affordable model variants in this comparison to gain even deeper insights.

Three models were tested in two different spec variants:

• AMFLOW PL Carbon vs. AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro
• Orbea WILD H20 vs. Orbea WILD M-LTD
• Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF 8 vs. Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF LTD

If the price of an eMTB doubles, are we really talking about twice the fun — or just half the common sense? Or is it simply the price of passion for cutting-edge tech and innovation?” Is an electronic drivetrain truly a gamechanger on the climbs, or does a mechanical one get the job done just as well on a punchy uphill? And how big is the real-world performance gap between carbon and aluminium components – or between an X0 and a GX rear derailleur?

Between €7,000 and €11,000, it’s not just the price gap that widens – it’s often the expectation gap too. High-end doesn’t just mean a “wow” moment when unboxing – it can also mean a painful “ouch” when it comes to servicing and replacing damaged parts. A broken carbon wheel? Expensive. A smashed electronic rear derailleur? Expensive. Especially when it comes to wear parts, it’s worth taking a second look. As motor output increases, so does the wear and tear you’re forced to contend with – particularly on the wheels and drivetrain components, like the rear derailleur, chain, and cassette. It’s up to the manufacturers to keep an eye on the running costs and spec their bikes with durable components – otherwise frustration comes as part of the package.

The biggest differences in the specs are in the suspension, brakes and drivetrain components. Example: the new FOX GRIP X2 damper of the Orbea Wild M-LTD offers is noticeably more sensitive and supportive than the GRIP cartridge on its sibling model, the H20 – something you really feel on long, rough descents, where the H20 tends to feel a bit unsettled. The brakes tell a similar story: the SRAM CODE Ultimate Stealth on the Spectral:ONfly CF LTD deliver noticeably stronger and more defined braking performance than the more affordable CODE R setup on the CF 8.

Most manufacturers spec mechanical rather than electronic drivetrains on their more affordable models. On the trail, the direct disadvantages are relatively minor – at least at first glance. But when you look closer, the differences become clear: electronic drivetrains deliver consistently precise gear changes, unaffected by cable stretch or wear. Systems like SRAM’s AXS Transmission can even shift reliably under load. However, the new mechanical SRAM Eagle Transmission drivetrains have now caught up in that respect too. On top of that, modern electronic systems like SRAM AXS or Shimano Di2 are very low maintenance and, in some cases, even customisable via app. They also offer added features like Free Shift or Auto Shift (as seen on Shimano Di2), which are only possible thanks to smart integration with the motor system – and these functions will become even more common in the future. Mechanical drivetrains, on the other hand, require more regular maintenance and fine-tuning – but they’re still a great choice for experienced riders. With a little sensitivity on your shifting thumb, you can sometimes achieve even smoother gear changes than with electronic systems.

In some areas, mid-range models even offer clear advantages: While top-spec builds often aim to cut the system weight with stiffer carbon parts like wheels and cockpits, this can lead to noticeably more front-end stiffness – which often results in quicker onset of arm pump on long, rough descents. Example: the aluminium handlebars of the AMFLOW PL Carbon noticeably reduces arm pump over long, rough trails, while the AMFLOW HMA-30 aluminium wheels are far more forgiving – they’re less likely to suffer catastrophic failure if damaged.

We’ve seen this game before with top-end models featuring the Bosch Performance Line CX Race motor over recent years – and Specialized have now taken it to the next level with their new S-Works motor: full power is reserved for the flagship S-Works model only. Opt for the more affordable Levo, and you’ll lose around 10 Nm of torque and about 50 watts of peak power – but you’ll get a small bonus in range 😉. Sure, it’s a tough pill to swallow for your ego, but a clever move when it comes to exclusivity. And in real-world riding? It’s no gamechanger. Our reader surveys show that most e-mountain bikes aren’t ridden in maximum support mode anyway – so for most riders, the difference will hardly matter. And seriously: don’t let those spec sheet numbers mess with your head!

The decision between top-spec and mid-range isn’t really about “what can I afford?” – it’s much more about “what do I actually need?” If you want maximum shifting precision, smart features like Auto Shift, and that last bit of high-tech performance, then electronic drivetrains and premium class are hard to avoid. But that also means higher complexity, potentially more delicate components, and definitely more expensive spares. At the same time, today’s mid-range bikes prove that they’re no longer just a compromise. The key takeaway: if you choose wisely, you often save money – not just at the time of purchase, but throughout the bike’s entire lifespan, both on maintenance and running costs. High-end doesn’t automatically mean next-level fun. Reliable performance, easy maintenance, and sensible spec choices matter more than flashy components. In the end, it’s not the price tag that counts – it’s the smile on your face out on the trail.

The eMTB world in transition – 10 key trends and insights from our mega e-mountain bike group test 2025

Even more homework?! New players, new technologies, new problems and new potential – our mega group test has uncovered plenty of insights that will help reshape the bike world. And they’ll force the industry to rethink their portfolios, steer their development work in new directions, and find a new balance. One thing became crystal clear in 2025: some bikes (almost) no longer have a real place on the market, and exciting new features can make a huge difference – there are smarter ways to spend your money than you might have thought!

DJI, DJI, DJI – there’s no doubt that the Chinese brand is stirring up a lot of discussion right now. And rightly so. With their Avinox M1 motor system, they’ve injected new energy and created an innovation pressure that’s forcing other manufacturers to step up. And that’s already happening – great news for us as riders and customers. At the same time, the bike industry needs to define new rules for self-regulation, to put the brakes on the escalating race for ever higher performance figures. There’s strong consensus on this, both within the industry and across much of the community – and the groundwork is already being laid, not least thanks to our E-MOUNTAINBIKE Think Tank in April 2025, where key CEOs and experts from the eMTB world gathered. Self-regulation isn’t about being party-poopers or admitting that no one can match the Chinese brands. It’s about preventing a chaotic arms race – so that innovation can be channelled in the right direction, and e-bikes can stay true to what they are: bicycles, not motorcycles. You’ll find all the background in our full Think Tank article.

1. Against the hype – is the DJI motor really the best motor?

Right now, no motor is creating more hype than the new DJI Avinox – and our latest trend survey from March 2025 with 2,400 participants confirms this. From 0 to 21% in less than a year – that’s insane! Just over 21% of riders say they want a DJI motor in their next bike. And for good reason – DJI are getting an incredible amount of things right. Even if the very sensible 750-watt maximum output limit comes into force, it won’t stop the Chinese brand from continuing to push innovation and progress.
As we already concluded in our big motor comparison test, the DJI Avinox remains the best motor of 2025. But one thing still holds true: even the best motor doesn’t automatically make a bike the top eMTB on the market. Our group test confirmed that loud and clear. In our Impossible Climb Challenge, it became obvious just how much depends on the bike itself – including its suspension and geometry. The Orbea WILD, for example, climbed faster and better with a Bosch CX motor (600 W max output) than the UNNO Mith with a DJI Avinox (850 W). Meanwhile, the AMFLOW PL, which also relies on a DJI motor, turned out to be the best climber in the entire test – thanks to its geometry, even though it was hampered by a shallow-profiled rear tire with poor traction. That said, the AMFLOW PL made clear sacrifices when it came to downhill performance. Bottom line: don’t just look at the numbers! What matters is what the bike was built for – and what it wasn’t.

Even though they have the potential, the DJI-powered bikes we tested in this group test couldn’t deliver across all disciplines – allowing other bikes to overtake them in the race for the title of best eMTB 2025.

2. Miss und Mister Universe!

Uncompromising. Fast. Radical. No question – we love that stuff in our editorial team. We’ve got testers and editors who’ve raced World Cups, spent whole seasons riding Whistler Bike Park and jumplines, and can throw backflips. But that’s not the reality for the majority of riders. And it’s similar inside many development teams, where you’ll often hear: “We build bikes we want to ride ourselves”. Now – that’s fine if you’re a niche brand. But if you’re an international magazine or a global manufacturer, you have to keep the wider market in mind. And here, there are huge differences. That’s why versatility and adaptability are king!

The best kind of versatility is when everything’s possible – but nothing’s compulsory. Specialized show how it’s done: a base setup that’s super intuitive and confidence-inspiring across all terrain and rider types. And that really is an art. The icing on the cake is customisability: if you want to tweak it, you can. Adjust the geometry to suit your riding style, choose from modular battery options, and enjoy a range of features that simply make life easier – like an integrated storage compartment in the downtube for all your trail essentials or emergencies, whether that’s a spare inner-tube, gummy bears for a sugar low, or a rain jacket.
Other brands like GHOST, MERIDA and Orbea also offer clever integrated tools and chain locks for trailside repairs. Beyond that, the Levo comes with Apple Find My integration – so you always know where your bike is. And big advantages also come from fast-charging technology and ABS systems, like the one used on the Scott Patron. We’ll dive deeper into those two points a little later.

Alongside a modular battery concept, an intuitive app with clear explanations of the adjustment parameters is absolutely crucial – it allows you to fine-tune motor characteristics and optimise consumption and range to match your personal needs.

3. No kissing allowed?!

Most bikes are worse even though they’re better. Or put another way: the best bike is only as good as its setup. What’s the point of having the wildest suspension technology with endless adjustment options for low- and high-speed compression and rebound, bottom-out control and air chamber tuning, if most customers neither understand it nor manage to set it up properly? The problem already starts with the basics – like setting the correct SAG for your rider weight. Some manufacturers, like SCOTT, offer easy-to-use indicators to help with this. Specialized used to have an Auto-SAG valve too, making it simple to dial in a decent base setup.
And yet many bike shops still don’t properly advise their customers or help them get their suspension sorted. In cases like this, only one thing can help: the KISS principle. No, not the kissing kind – it stands for Keep It Simple and Stupid! Bike and suspension brands clearly need to do a better job here. Because the range of people buying and riding these bikes is broader than ever before.

4. Bigger batteries = less range?

You can’t cheat physics! And that’s often forgotten in today’s race for ever more motor power. More motor power = more energy consumption – at least if you actually use it. For example, the new Specialized Levo Gen4 has a lower range than the previous Levo Gen3 in the highest support mode – even though the battery has grown! However, you have to consider range (or vertical range) in relation to speed. The battery might drain faster, but you also reach your destination faster – or with less effort. The good news: whether you use the full power or not is entirely up to you. You can easily adjust motor output in the app. The two key parameters are maximum power and support factor – meaning how much the motor boosts your own input. How directly and dynamically the power is delivered depends on motor tuning and responsiveness. Our vertical range tests also showed that range isn’t just a question of riding style – it’s also influenced by how the manufacturer has set the system up.

The Specialized, for example, continues to deliver full support right to the end, whereas the Rocky Mountain Instinct Powerplay SL starts to reduce power steadily once the battery drops to around 10% – less support, lower speed, but more range. With DJI’s Avinox system, there’s a sharp power cut at 5%, which in Trail mode feels like hitting a wall – simply because the drop in support is so sudden compared to before. The bigger the gap, the more noticeable (and unpleasant) it feels. It would be great if, as riders, we could customise how and when the motor reduces its output – allowing us to tailor range and ride characteristics to suit each individual tour!

5. Radical progress and setbacks in design?

Another side effect of the power race: batteries are getting bigger – and so are the downtubes. SCOTT Patron, MERIDA eONE-EIGHTY, Specialized Levo, GHOST E-RIOT – all of them have seriously chunky downtubes. Visually, the bulky batteries from Bosch and Specialized mark a clear step backwards in bike design. How is it possible that the UNNO Mith has a slimmer downtube with its massive 800 Wh battery than other bikes with a permanently integrated 400 Wh battery? No question: the long and slender 800 Wh battery of the DJI system allows for some beautifully clean bike designs – especially when brands like UNNO make full use of it. But there’s a trade-off: the battery is permanently integrated and not easy to remove for external charging. And having a removable battery can make a huge difference to bike design. The downtube on the previous Specialized Levo Gen3 was slimmer than on the current model. That’s not just down to the larger battery capacity – it’s mainly because the new battery is far easier to remove. Instead of pulling it out from the bottom bracket area, it now slides out sideways – which has a noticeable impact on the frame shape.
For many riders, a removable battery is hugely important – whether because they don’t have a charging point in their bike storage area, or because they want to take the bike on holiday.

6. The price of wear – running costs

As motor power and torque increase, so do the forces acting on the drivetrain, gears, wheels – and even the motor components themselves. Greater loads inevitably mean more wear. And that means higher running costs. Good riding and shifting technique, plus regular cleaning and maintenance, definitely help – but the extra stress on parts can’t simply be ignored. That’s why we’re calling for more moderate power outputs – before riders are left shocked and frustrated when their expensive bikes start swallowing more money than expected. It’s up to both motor manufacturers and drivetrain brands to take responsibility here.

7. ABS on the trail?

In our test field, only the SCOTT Patron features an ABS system – even though ABS would offer a huge safety boost for a wide range of riders and scenarios. Sure, integration still isn’t perfect, and cable management could be cleaner – but honestly, that’s a small price to pay compared to an unnecessary crash or going over the bars, right? We’re firmly in favour of seeing ABS used on more eMTBs – not just on top-spec models, but also in the mid-range segment. The additional cost would be acceptable, and ABS should become a major selling point at retail – especially now that brake system compatibility has improved significantly!

8. Fast charging

Fast charging is awesome – with the systems from DJI and Specialized, new usage scenarios and battery concepts are opening up. Fast charger instead of a range extender or a massive battery? Totally possible! Forgot to charge your bike and about to head out for a ride? In cases like that, a fast charger can save your day. Within an hour, you can top up enough juice while you grab a second breakfast – and then hit the trails fully recharged! Fast charging? Yes, please!

9. A new generation of eMTBs

Light eMTB or full power? That’s no longer a choice you have to make.

Light eMTBs can still be fantastic bikes, but today there are models that offer full power with similar key figures – and without compromising trail performance.
Sure, DJI might overshoot the mark a little with the Avinox motor in terms of raw output, but bikes like the new UNNO prove that an elegant look, a powerful 800 Wh battery, top-notch integration and low weight are no longer mutually exclusive – all while being seriously capable. And if DJI tune their motor to meet the new power limits in the future, we might even see even more compact systems coming. That would be pretty epic, wouldn’t it?!

10. Playing with fire

The price we pay for pushing the boundaries is high. As an international magazine, we keep a close eye on the global eMTB scene: in the US and Canada, DJI currently exceed the Class 1 e-bike certification limit in most states. Specialized now offer a Class 3 option for the Levo in the US – it’s legal, but at the same time it risks jeopardising trail access. We need rules and regulations to steer development in the right direction and to prevent abuse – before it’s too late.

From the trails to the think tank: our insights and your input are shaping the future of eMTB development

We all know it: criticising is easy – making things better is an art! That’s why we didn’t waste any time and organised a Think Tank with the most important CEOs and experts from the eMTB world to discuss the current risks in eMTB development, along with our latest insights and analysis. The focus of the Think Tank: finding consensus on a smart approach to self-regulation. Our goal is clear: to accelerate the development of better bikes and help shape the market with common sense – because that will benefit everyone: riders, retailers, and manufacturers alike! We don’t just see ourselves as a magazine, but as an experienced and passionate team that actively shapes the market with clear impulses and represents the interests of our readers.
Wir verstehen uns nicht bloß als Magazin, sondern als ein erfahrenes wie begeistertes Team, das mit klaren Impulsen den Markt gestaltet und die Interessen unserer Leser vertritt.

Thousands of you took the time to answer our trend survey, providing direct input for the Think Tank and helping to shape the next generation of eMTBs. This level of direct, unfiltered feedback has never been seen before. A huge thank you for that!

Our 7 development and action recommendations for manufacturers

The smartest insight is only as valuable as its implementation. That’s why we’ve summed up our development and action recommendations for manufacturers right here.

1. Smart self-regulation is essential to future-proof e-bike development. To keep e-bike innovation on a sustainable path, meaningful self-regulation is key. And while such measures may guide the industry, they’re unlikely to slow DJI down – the Chinese brand’s innovative spirit is beyond question. At the same time, it would be wrong to count Bosch and others out. They’re far from being left behind, with clear strengths of their own. In fact, we’re already expecting some exciting and positive updates from a few manufacturers as early as May. That said, Bosch and the rest will need to significantly improve integration in their next generation of systems. DJI, on the other hand, will need to introduce a removable battery option if they want to reach new rider groups and expand into different e-bike categories. Regulation brings direction – but leaves room for innovation. Regulation helps define the direction of development for motor manufacturers, yet there’s still plenty of room for product differentiation. Our forecast? We’ll soon see noticeable improvements delivered via software updates – particularly in modulation, traction control, power curves and customisability. For the tech-savvy riders: our Impossible Climb Challenge already proved that smart uphill-enhancing features have a far greater impact than maximum power alone. In our elevation range tests, software behaviour revealed significant differences. This is where it makes perfect sense to give riders app-based control – for example: at what state of charge (SoC) should the battery begin to reduce output? Rocky Mountain, Specialized and DJI all handle this in different ways, each with its own advantages and drawbacks. Beyond that, we’re genuinely excited to see what new features and developments designers and engineers across the industry will surprise us with next.
2. The relevance of light e-MTBs is fading into a niche. Whether bikes like these still make commercial sense is something each brand will have to decide for themselves – but we have our doubts.
3. Bike and motor manufacturers now face the challenge of developing models that, in combination with new technologies like fast charging and modular battery concepts, are more versatile and tailored to individual rider needs. One particularly exciting prospect: a cross-brand, standardised charging interface. Not only could this significantly reduce the cost of fast chargers, it would also be a true gamechanger for future battery systems. At the same time, it would make life much easier for e-mountainbikers – simplifying the e-bike experience and lowering the barriers to entry. Sounds like the perfect topic for our next Think Tank, doesn’t it?
4. Additional features like ABS should be offered as an option on both mid-range and flagship models – many riders would benefit from the added safety and control!
5. Basics like suspension setup and similar essentials need to be explained more clearly and made even easier to adjust – because the best bike is only as good as its setup!
6. Product managers need to give more thought to the running costs of their bikes when selecting components – from drivetrain wear parts to maintenance factors like brakes that are easy to bleed. And they should be asking themselves: is electronic always better? Or just more expensive?
7. Component adaptability matters: many riders choose their frame size based on reach – which makes the dropper post a key component. How far can it be slammed? Can the travel be adjusted so it suits riders of the same height but with different leg lengths? It doesn’t cost more – it’s just smart 😉

Tops & Flops while searching for the best eMTB for 2025

Details matter. We’ve already covered the major trends and tech topics – but as this group test has once again shown, the devil is often in the detail. And it’s all the more frustrating when some features in the 2025 model year still feel stuck in 2018. That’s just not acceptable anymore! Here are the Tops & Flops from the test!

Flops:

Tops:

What’s the best e-MTB of 2025? All eMTBs in this test at a glance

Curtain up! Which bikes truly stand out? Which ones have earned the coveted international titles of Best in Test and Best Buy? And which bike takes home our Editor’s Choice award for the very first time?

We’ve decided to write individual e-mountainbike reviews this year only for the most exciting and important bikes. However, you’ll find a clear summary below to help you place every bike we tested in context.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro

The AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro, priced at € 9,999, proves that a full-power eMTB doesn’t have to look bulky. With its elegant design, seamless integration and high connectivity, this 20.7 kg bike showcases what a modern eMTB can be. Uphill, the AMFLOW is unbeatable with its DJI Avinox motor, proving one of the best climbers in the entire test. On the descents, however, the shallow-profiled tires limit the bike’s performance – we tested the bike with the 800 Wh battery. The low front end also comes at the expense of security, which means it quickly reaches its limits on demanding trails. The AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro is the optimal choice for riders who prioritise uphill speed and don’t expect top-tier downhill performance.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – AMFLOW PL Carbon

The AMFLOW PL Carbon is the budget-friendly version of the Pro model also featured in this test. Despite being equipped with a powerful DJI motor and a big 800 Wh battery, it boasts a sleek design. When it comes to uphill performance, the silver AMFLOW budget variant is hard to beat. However, once you turn your back on the climb, the € 6,449 AMFLOW starts to show its limitations compared to the high-end Pro version. The tires, the FOX 36 fork a basic Grip damper, and the low front end all reduce confidence and force you to brake earlier when things get rough.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Cannondale Moterra SL 1

The Cannondale Moterra SL1 impresses with modern looks and a top-tier spec, retailing at € 9,000. Handling is predictable and forgiving of mistakes, but the rear end with flex stays and the very firm suspension require an experienced rider. Powered by a punchy Shimano EP801 motor and a 600 Wh battery, this bike is built more for sporty outings than for long-distance epics – though its sub-21 kg weight makes everyday handling refreshingly easy. Overall, the Cannondale is a solid all-rounder, but it truly shines on flowy descents and lands itself in the midfield of the test field.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF LTD

The Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF LTD combines a light system weight and agile, direct handling, proving one of the most fun eMTBs in this test – all for € 8,999. However, the weak TQ-HPR50 motor with just 50 Nm of torque leaves the Spectral trailing far behind the other e-bikes on the climbs, and technical ascents are not an option. On flowy descents, though, the Spectral:ONfly CF LTD really comes into its own, showing off its strengths. In rough terrain, you’ll need to ease off the gas due to limited composure and a lack of straight-line stability. But if you’re after a playful light eMTB that’s all about maximum fun, this is the one!

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF 8

The budget-friendly Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF 8 manages to strike a great balance between lightness and agility – weighing in just 400 grams more than the flagship model. And just like its top-tier sibling, it hardly feels like an eMTB at all: the handling is playful, making it an absolute blast to ride. With its natural ride feeling, the TQ-HPR50 drive system, which has just 50 Nm of torque, isn’t a shuttle replacement but more of a subtle pedal assist that enhances the ride without overpowering it. When you take the Spectral:ONfly into rougher terrain, you’ll need to ease off the speed a bit more than you would with the flagship model, as the suspension tends to stiffen up quicker. That said, the Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF 8 is a fun companion for just € 5,599 – as playful as a traditional analogue mountain bike.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Canyon Neuron:ON AL 9

Retailing at a very appetible price of € 5,500, the Canyon Neuron:ON AL is a solid e-mountainbike with a Bosch CX motor that’s easy to ride – as long as you don’t push it too hard. It really comes into its own on tours and mellow flow trails, where it’ll spark your neurons in all the right ways. On steep descents, though, it quickly reaches its limits. But that’s fair enough – according to Canyon, this bike is primarily built for touring. At this price point, compromises in trail performance compared to much more expensive models are inevitable – and you’ll feel that most in the fork and tires out on the trail. In return, you get a pannier rack mount and Bosch Connect features included, which make the Neuron:ON AL 9 a great everyday companion with its removable 800 Wh battery. The Canyon Neuron:ON AL is a solid entry-level full-suspension e-MTB with good touring and daily-use features.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – FOCUS SAM² 6.0

The FOCUS SAM² 6.0 stays true to its roots – and to the line, quite literally. It’s one of the strongest performers in the entire group test when things get rough on the descents. Pick your line, keep your fingers off the brakes and let it fly – the SAM takes care of the rest. It also comes with a tough, trail-ready spec for € 8,500. That said, the sturdy build shows on the scales: at 26.5 kg, it’s the second-heaviest bike in the test. Flowing, playful trails become a workout, and you’ll need to put in serious effort to get the speed you want. This bike is clearly made to go fast – and to be pushed hard in challenging terrain.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – GHOST E-RIOT LTD

The new edition of the GHOST RIOT is a total success! You’ll get a lot of bike for your money – 24 kg to be exact! The GHOST E-RIOT LTD impresses with a neat integration of the Bosch CX motor, excellent uphill performance and confidence-inspiring handling on the descents. If you’re looking for a bike that makes it easy to tackle demanding trails, this is the one. Thanks to the easily removable 800 Wh battery and the display, the RIOT – which costs exactly € 10,000 – even gains some everyday practicality despite its sporty character, only narrowly missing out on an award. The only room for improvement? The battery cover – it came off several times during testing!

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Haibike HYBE CF 11

The Haibike HYBE CF 11 may not have taken the top spot in our 30-bike comparison test, but it still puts in a strong performance. The highlights include a capable suspension, confidence inspiring handling, and excellent uphill performance. The long seat tube, however, limits freedom of movement on very steep sections, which can be a bit uncomfortable. Still, with its full carbon frame, Bosch CX motor, removable 800 Wh battery and consistently solid performance, the HYBE is a fun e-mountainbike with serious touring potential – a versatile ride for anyone who loves sporty adventures.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – KTM Macina Prowler

The KTM Macina Prowler takes on the competition in our 2025 e-mountainbike comparison test with a price tag of € 8,000 – but let’s get straight to the point: it fails miserably. The bike offers decent comfort on the climbs and powers its rider uphill confidently with the fifth-generation Bosch Performance Line CX motor. However, when things get technical, the rear wheel struggles to generate traction. Those expecting more on the descent will be disappointed: in rock gardens, the stiff setup turns the ride into a game of ping-pong, which results in sub-par composure. Even in flowy trail sections, it’s hard to have fun astride the 25.7 kg Macina. That said, everyday practicality is a plus – with a removable 800 Wh battery, powerful motor and a comfortable riding position. And of course, the coil shock is perfect for showing off in front of the ice cream parlour.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – MERIDA eONE-SIXTY SL 10K

The MERIDA eONE-SIXTY SL 10K is a flow trail specialist. Experienced riders will love the direct handling and sporty character, and will be able to ride the € 10,999 bike fast and with confidence. Beginners, on the other hand, will only get their money’s worth on smooth trails – in rough terrain, the stiff setup makes it less forgiving and more likely to throw off less experienced pilots. The spec is well thought-out, and the Bosch SX motor combined with a compact 400 Wh battery performs well on the climbs. All in all, the eONE-SIXTY SL is a lightweight 19.6 kg performance machine for advanced riders – with a few deductions in rougher terrain.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – MERDIA eONE-EIGHTY 900

Step aside for the heavyweight champ! Priced at € 7,499, the MERIDA eONE-SIXTY 900 doesn’t just make a statement with its hefty 27.1 kg weight. It also secures a strong position in terms of touring and everyday practicality – thanks to features like a headlight, the Bosch CX motor, easily removable 800 Wh battery and very comfortable, upright riding position. Just don’t expect to lift it onto your car’s rear rack without a workout! In rough rock gardens, the bike stays true to its green camo paint job, bulldozing everything in its path with 180 mm of travel – like a leopard tank. While it’s at it, it inspires huge amounts of confidence and always remains composed. That said, it demands quite a bit of effort in flowy sections, where it offers relatively little return on power input. Still, the MERIDA eONE-SIXTY carves out a solid place in the upper midfield, with standout strengths in descending and everyday use.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Moustache Game 160.9

The Moustache Game 160.9 delivers one of the best uphill performances in the entire test field – all for € 9,000 and with a system weight of just under 25 kg. Powered by the 5th generation Bosch Performance Line CX motor, and equipped with long chainstays and grippy MAXXIS ASSEGAI tires, this bike climbs absolutely anything. For beginners and riders who value stability, the Game is also a solid partner on the descents, especially when things get rough. The tilted motor – with the housing facing upward – sparked some debate in the test field and isn’t exactly a beauty. On the bright side, the easily removable battery and the small frame pocket above it add practical value for everyday use. That puts the Moustache comfortably in the midfield overall, and alongside the Orbea WILD, it’s one of the best Bosch-powered bikes for technical climbs.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Orbea WILD M-LTD

The Orbea WILD M-LTD carbon edition couldn’t quite pull off the hat-trick. A third consecutive test win would have been the icing on Orbea’s already impressive cake. Still, at € 11,728, the WILD remains one of the best bikes in the test field – composed, fast and incredibly intuitive. Thanks to the Bosch CX motor, it also delivers powerful, confident support on the climbs. And if you want to customise your bike to match your preferences and style, the MyO configurator is hard to beat. However, with its permanently installed 600 Wh battery, this 22.5 kg e-bike falls short when it comes to everyday practicality.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Orbea WILD H20

After the carbon version of the Orbea WILD claimed the top spot in our E-MOUNTAINBIKE group test twice, we’ve now included the aluminium H20 edition for the first time. Weighing in at 24.7 kg, it’s around 2 kg heavier than its carbon counterpart – but at just € 6,950, it’s also significantly more affordable. When it comes to performance, the Orbea WILD H20 still climbs into the upper ranks of the test field. Our MyO-configured test bike performs only slightly below its more expensive counterpart. The only real drawback is the underdamped fork, which takes a bit of the edge off its downhill confidence. Otherwise, the WILD remains a super intuitive e-mountainbike with standout strengths in handling, technical climbs and descents. In terms of all-round capability and everyday practicality, though, it shares the same compromises as the top-spec version – which keeps it from reaching the podium.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Orbea Rise LT M-Team

Even without a podium finish in this group test, the Orbea Rise LT M-Team remains an impressive fun machine, which is mainly due to the combination of the low system weight of just 20.2 kg, the playful handling and capable suspension. It scores well with its all-round qualities, shines on flow trails and stays composed and controllable in rough terrain. Uphill, the Shimano EP801 RS motor provides solid support, drawing power from a 420 Wh battery. The high-quality spec is convincing, and thanks to the MyO configurator, the Orbea Rise can be individually customised – which explains the specific test bike price of € 10,189. The only downside: the annoying rattling noise of the Shimano motor.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Propain Sresh CF

What’ll it be? Like all Propain bikes, the Sresh CF shines with its extensive configurator, which lets you customise both the spec and the look of your bike down to the smallest detail. Suspension, brakes, wheels and much more can be customised from a range of options. The model we tested – the Sresh CF – costs just over € 9,000, and comes equipped with a Shimano EP801 motor and a performance-oriented spec, which aims to make it stand out as an uncompromising all-rounder. But it doesn’t quite pull it off across the board. The firm suspension only reveals its full potential in the hands of aggressive riders. Beginner-friendly suspension? Nope. That puts the Sresh somewhere between custom-built individuality and true all-rounder in the overall ranking. And while the removable 600 Wh battery adds a bit of everyday practicality, the bike’s character is simply too sporty for a laid-back tour.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – R RAYMON Tarok Ultra

The R RAYMON Tarok Ultra is the first e-MTB to feature a ZF motor and enters the stage with a confident price tag of € 10,499. In return, it offers a high-quality spec, good level of comfort and solid handling on tours and moderate trails. The powerful ZF motor delivers strong support at lower speeds with its 90 Nm of torque, but it’s loud and loses punch as speed increases. It also feels a bit rough underfoot – there are more refined systems on the market. Still, with its 756 Wh battery, the R RAYMON looks sharp and feels stable and composed in rough terrain. On flowy trails, however, it comes across as a bit sluggish.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Rocky Mountain Instinct Powerplay SL

The Rocky Mountain Instinct Powerplay SL, which employs the exclusive Dyname S4 Lite motor, strikes a sweet spot between support and stamina for sporty e-mountainbikers – despite its modest 480 Wh battery. Weighing in at 20.3 kg, it’s neither ultra-light nor overly powerful, but finds its niche right in between.
Although the 65 Nm of torque might not sound impressive on paper, the Instinct Powerplay climbs surprisingly well thanks to the motor’s linear character. A pity: the additional motor pulley makes a loud grinding noise, which detracts from the otherwise solid ride feel. On the way down, this € 9,700 Rocky stands out with its well-balanced suspension, while the low front end is better suited to experienced riders. With its ride-focused performance and lack of app-based features, this bike is more likely to appeal to hardcore mountain bikers than to newcomers venturing off-road for the first time.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Santa Cruz Vala X0 AXS RSV

Santa Cruz stay true to their roots – while at the same time breaking with tradition. The design of this € 11,499 eMTB marks a radical visual departure, making it look almost generic, yet its ride quality remains every bit as refined as you’d expect from Santa Cruz. The Vala, which comes equipped with a Bosch CX motor and 600 Wh battery, may no longer be immediately recognisable as a Santa Cruz just by its looks – but it still rides with the same performance, intuitive handling and reliability that the Californian brand is known for. What holds it back from taking the test win is the lack of everyday practicality: there’s no display, no removable battery, and no smart features. But if you’re after one thing above all – maximum ride performance – the Vala is a top choice.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – SCOTT Patron ST 900 Tuned

Priced at € 10,999, the SCOTT Patron ST 900 Tuned certainly knows how to come to a stop – just not at the top of our big eMTB group test. With a system weight of 24.4 kg and a Bosch CX motor with a massive hefty 800 Wh battery, it’s not among the sportiest bikes in this test field. That said, despite its bulky appearance, it handles surprisingly well on the trail. A standout feature for both beginners and seasoned riders: the Bosch ABS Pro system. Overall, the bike delivers a strong sense of security and great everyday practicality. The removable battery, Bosch ABS Pro, integrated rear light, kickstand mount and excellent saddle comfort make it a solid companion for trails, touring and daily use alike.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo SL

The Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo SL was one of the pioneers of the light eMTB era – and it still cuts a super clean, slim and premium figure. Tipping the scales at just 18.2 kg, it’s the lightest e-bike in the entire group test, though with a price tag of € 14,000, it’s also the second most expensive. The neatly-integrated Specialized 1.2 SL motor system, which delivers a modest 50 Nm of torque and draws its power from a 320 Wh battery, isn’t built to replace a shuttle truck – it’s more of a sporty climbing aid at the pace of a stairlift. So, it doesn’t earn much glory on the uphills, but on flowy descents it secures top marks with ease. It’s one of the most fun bikes in the test – more likely to give you sore cheeks from grinning than podium results. All in all, what you get here is a very expensive, very light and very sporty bike that’s so much fun, it almost justifies the price.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Thömus Lightrider E3 Pro

The Thömus Lightrider, equipped with a Shimano EP801 motor, weighs in at 23.8 kg and rolls into your private bike garage at a hefty € 12,190. The Swiss e-mountainbike features discreetly integrated front and rear lights, a USB-C charging port and a removable 800 Wh battery – which make it a top performer for both touring and everyday use. In terms of performance, the bike scores above average across the board – though it doesn’t shine as the brightest star in any single discipline. What it does manage better than most is striking a balance between relaxed forest road climbs and technical descents. Here, the Thömus feels composed and easy to control.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Transition Regulator CX XT

The American bike manufacturer might not have dominated our group test with the € 9,990 Transition Regulator CX XT, but certainly made an impression. While their Bosch CX-equipped eMTB doesn’t set any new benchmarks, the 22 kg Regulator performs brilliantly whenever gravity takes over. When it comes to everyday practicality, the permanently integrated 600 Wh battery does call for compromises – which is why it doesn’t quite cut it as the ultimate all-rounder. But if you love charging hard on descents and regularly ride both flowy and technical trails, the Regulator CX delivers mature trail DNA in spades.

>What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Transition Regulator SX XT

With the Regulator SX, Transition launched the lightweight counterpart of the Regulator CX powerhouse. It tips the scales at just 19 kg and costs the same € 9,990 as its beefier brother. Intuitive handling and a well-thought-out spec are included in the price. The low system weight can be achieved above all through the smaller 400 Wh battery and several lighter components compared to the Regulator CX, which makes the bike noticeably easier to handle.
Flowy descents suit the Regulator SX even more than its big brother, but when it comes to technical climbs, it calls for compromises due to the weaker Bosch SX motor. The motor only delivers full power at high pedalling cadences – which can quickly lead to pedal strikes in blocked terrain. So, can the Regulator SX hold its own against the CX version, despite the reduced spec and identical price? Our answer: no – only for a very specific group of riders.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – Whyte ELyte EVO Stag Works

The Whyte ELyte EVO Stag Works takes a bold approach: pairing a full-fat Bosch Performance Line CX motor with the smallest available 400 Wh battery. In return, the bike offers high modularity – there’s space for the optional PowerMore 250 Wh range extender, plus a water bottle. The aim? To be ready for anything. And when it comes to technical climbs, the ELyte impresses with full motor support and a low overall weight of just 20.9 kg. On flowing descents, it’s just as confident and composed. But is this unconventional concept enough to claim the test victory? Unfortunately not. Modularity always comes with compromises – in this case, a small, permanently integrated battery and limited suitability for long-distance tours. As a result, the Whyte lands comfortably mid-pack.

What’s the best eMTB for 2025? – YT DECOY SN MX CORE 3

More speed for your money – nowhere else will you get this much downhill performance for so little cash. The YT DECOY SN MX CORE 3 is made for riders who refuse to compromise when it comes to descending. With its precise handling, unwavering composure and playful character, it pumps, pops and rips through any terrain while delivering maximum fun factor in the process. Riding uphill, the 21.2 kg YT is more of a means to an end with its small 430 Wh battery. And with just 60 Nm of torque from the FAZUA motor, technical climbs demand a fair bit of legwork. But if you’re thinking about the descent the entire way up, this bike delivers serious performance for a bargain price of just € 5,799. Last year, the FAZUA Ride 60 system gave us a headache with a string of technical issues – but it looks like the Bavarians have finally nailed their quality control!

Best Buy – the smartest choice for your money

Our best buy award goes to the bike that strikes the strongest price-performance ratio in this test. It’s not about cutting corners at all costs – it’s about making a smart investment. If you’re after maximum riding fun without blowing your budget, this is the bike to go for.

Best Buy Award: FOCUS JAM² 6.0

At € 7,999, the FOCUS JAM² 6.0 isn’t the cheapest bike in this test but it’s hands down the smartest way to spend your money. Forget flashy components and loud branding – this bike delivers where it counts: strong trail performance, quality spec, a sleek finish and a well-thought-out overall package. The result? An eMTB that impresses both up and downhill with intuitive handling and a versatile character – proving a great fit for beginners and seasoned trail riders alike. The aluminium frame is superbly finished, although the brakes do reach their limit on super-steep descents. The JAM² 6.0 is a capable all-rounder that covers a wide range of scenarios – and a true insider tip. Our clear Best Buy recommendation!

Editor’s Choice – the bike we fell in love with

Our Editor’s Choice isn’t about the most versatile bike in the test field or the safest pick for the mainstream – it’s all about character. A bold concept paired with a ride feel that just clicked with us from the very first pedal stroke.

Editor’s Choice:UNNO Mith Pro

The new UNNO Mith gives a glimpse into the future of e-MTBs. If you’re looking for the perfect all-rounder for beginners and experts across all types of terrain, you’ll want to look elsewhere. The UNNO Mith Pro follows a clear philosophy: razor-sharp design and handling – built primarily for descending. Despite its impressively powerful DJI Avinox M1 motor, it’s only average on steep technical climbs. But point it downhill or into demanding terrain, and it comes alive – provided you have the skills to handle it. Visually and technically, the UNNO Mith Pro combines the best of both the light and full-power e-MTB categories. It’s not made for the masses – but it’s exactly the kind of bike our experienced editorial team loves to ride. That’s why it earns our very first Editor’s Choice award.

Test winner – the ultimate all-rounder

The best eMTB can’t afford to shine in just one area – it has to deliver across the board. This bike stands out as the most balanced all-rounder in the entire test field, offering an unbeatable combination of performance, everyday practicality and pure riding fun. Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned pro, whether you’re cruising flow trails or tackling gnarly tech sections, this bike gives every rider exactly what they need – on any terrain.

Best in test: Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo 4

The new Specialized Levo proves that you don’t need to chase superlatives to be the ultimate all-rounder. What really matters is getting the balance right. It’s put on a bit more weight compared to its predecessor, but delivers the most balanced handling in the entire test field – for both beginners and experienced riders – with a perfect mix of composure and agility. The new S-Works motor system, with its modular battery concept, fast-charging capability, informative top tube display and intuitive app, convinces across the board. Even though the downtube has grown in size due to the easily removable 840 Wh battery, the execution feels spot-on. Outstanding handling + well-thought-out features + an excellent motor system = a well-deserved test winner!

Conclusions about our 2025 e-mountainbike comparison test

So, what’s the outlook for the 2025 eMTB year? If you want to spend your money wisely, you need the right information. And as our test clearly shows, the differences in quality, performance, versatility and overall functionality are still huge – even when the spec sheets might look surprisingly similar. One thing’s certain: numbers alone don’t tell the full story.

What are the trends telling us? The launch of the DJI Avinox system in autumn 2024 has sparked a fresh wave of hype around performance figures and technical data. But faster, higher, further isn’t always better – in fact, quite the opposite. That mindset often misses the mark when it comes to what riders actually need out on the trail.
At the same time, credit where credit’s due: DJI have got a lot of things right – regardless of raw numbers. Their system has cranked up the pressure on established brands to innovate, and that’s good news for the entire eMTB world in the long run. So, hats off to DJI. That said, at the time of our test, no bike equipped with the Avinox motor managed to deliver a well-rounded enough package to take the overall win as the best all-rounder.

2025 is shaping up to be a brilliant year for eMTB enthusiasts. We’ve never seen such a wide selection of innovative, smart and incredibly versatile bikes. But our test also shows that some models fail to live up to the hype – and for a few, their place in the market is quickly vanishing. If you want to find the right bike, it all starts with being honest about your own needs – and looking beyond all the marketing gloss. We hope this group test has given you a solid foundation to help make smarter choices – and to have even more fun out on the trail.

All bikes in test: AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro, Canyon Spectral:ONfly CF LTD, FOCUS JAM² 6.0, GHOST E-RIOT LTD, Haibike HYBE CF 11, MERIDA eONE-SIXTY SL 10K, Orbea WILD M-LTD, Orbea Rise LT M-Team, R RAYMON Tarok Ultra, Rocky Mountain Instinct Powerplay SL, Santa Cruz Vala X0 AXS RSV, SCOTT Patron ST 900 Tuned, Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo 4, Transition Regulator CX XT, UNNO Mith Pro, YT DECOY SN MX CORE 3.

Words: Benedikt Schmidt, Robin Schmitt, Julian Schwede, Lars Engmann Photos: Peter Walker, Julian Schwede, Robin Schmitt Translation: Eric Frajria