Oregon law seeks to ban street-legal electric bikes from bike lanes
A new bill submitted to the Oregon Legislative Assembly is seeking to ban the electric bikes on the 3 -street street of the State.
Class 3 electric bikes include things that can reach up to 28 miles per hour (45 km / h), while Class 1 and 2 electric bikes can only reach 20 miles per hour (32 km / h).
Below Bill 471 SenateSuggested law If a ride “a bike or a bike with electrical grade 3 on a sidewalk, a bike path or a bicycle line, it turns it into a mass.” According to the Oregon law, traditional pedal bikes can be legally handled on the sidewalks unless it is restricted by a local guidelines, but electronic bikes have already been banned from working on the sidewalks.
Therefore, the proposed law is effectively banning electric bikes that are capable of speeding up more than 20 miles per hour of use in bicycle lines. Instead, such bikes are only allowed to use on public roads.
In addition, Section 2 of the bill seeks to eliminate key protection for cyclists, including 20+ miles of electric bikes on bicycle lines. According to the current law, a driver can cite for failing to ride on a bike line when crossing the driver through the bike line, such as crossing the road, parking, etc.
The proposed law eliminates the need for drivers to gain the right to cyclists on the Class 3 bicycle on bicycle lines.
It should be noted that drivers cannot detect a Class 3 Class 3 bike from other electronic bike classes riding in a bike line because the difference is based on performance.
Electrical catch
Certainly, I support this law as long as we can apply logic equally. If the logic goes, Class 3 bicycles (up to 28 miles per hour) have the ability to ride faster than traffic flow in a cyclist, so we should be banned in such bike lines, so we may only ban cars that are capable of highway on the streets of the city. “Can your car move faster than 40 miles per hour? Sorry, you know the rules. Keep it away from the streets of the city.”
Logical, right? The same logic, if this can go faster, is by no means allowed to work there.
I mean, if a 60 -pound electronic bike that has the potential to be 8 miles per hour faster than another electronic bike is such a threat to public health and safety, so what should we think of 5,000 pound vehicles that can easily be over 120 miles per hour with a two -inch fingerprint? Certainly we pull them out of cities every day, right? That’s right, guys? Kids …?
Well, now we’re getting serious. The law is awful, and the lawmakers who have disrupted it have to be bicycled by 21 miles per hour and have to ride two minutes with their batch of 40+ miles per hour to really understand what the real danger is. Then let’s hear that they are trying to tell us how a Class 3 E -bike is a real danger.
I don’t try to say that we have to completely ignore that sometimes people deal with an electronic bike. This happens even in very rare cases. But you know what happens Regular Items? Cyclists and pedestrians are hit and killed by cars. So instead of spending the legislative effort to try to withdraw electronic bikes to the roads, we may try to keep car fenders away from the bike. Or invest more in bicycle lines. Or enforce traffic violations for all road users. Or raising awareness of awareness for drivers and riders alike. There are many good answers, but none of them can be found in the bill.
Through: kmr
FTC: We use revenue -related car links. More
